• Login
  • My Account
  • Logout
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy

THATFILMGUY

Film Previews, News, Reviews and Lists

  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Lists
  • Five Stars
  • News
You are here: Home / Film Reviews / The Good, The Bad and the Ugly (1966) review by That Film Dude

The Good, The Bad and the Ugly (1966) review by That Film Dude

July 9, 2012 by That Film Guy Leave a Comment

This is, for many people, the Big One as far as Westerns go. Others may argue for The Searchers or Once Upon a Time in the West, but Sergio Leone’s spectacular conclusion to the Dollars Trilogy, The Good, The Bad and the Ugly, invariably comes at or near the top of Western best of lists. And it’s not hard to see why. Everything that was lacking in the previous two films has been removed, everything good has been improved, and it has a scale and scope previously unseen in spaghetti Westerns; The Good, The Bad and the Ugly transcends its spaghetti B-movie roots to become a genuine epic, and one of the best Westerns ever made.

Clint Eastwood plays Blondie (The Good), who has teamed up with Eli Wallach’s Tuco (The Ugly) to make money by cashing in the bounty on Tuco’s head, then freeing him and restarting the process. Meanwhile, Lee Van Cleef’s Angel Eyes (The Bad) is on the trail of a hidden cache of $200,000 in Confederate gold. Later on, Blondie and Tuco also learn of the gold, and the three of them all want to get their hands on it, even if it means passing through the front lines of the American Civil War.

The Civil War had often been a part of Westerns prior to this film, but had rarely been depicted as it is here. Gone is the glorifying of the Union at the expense of the Confederacy: Leone shows us both sides fairly and equally, emphasising neither the good nor the bad about them. The perspective of the Confederacy had been almost unheard of in Westerns before this, and the horrors of war as seen from their side are an extremely harrowing and sobering take on the conflict. The Confederates’ point of view would go on to become important in a great many revisionist Westerns which were keen to debunk the heroic myth of the Union: the overtly positive view of the Confederacy in The Outlaw Josey Wales, contrasted with the murderous Unionists, likely would not have been possible without The Good, The Bad and the Ugly’s grim, morally ambiguous take on the Civil War.

Said moral ambiguity naturally extends to the characters as well. Gone are the vaguely noble potential motivations of the previous two films: here, no one wants to free a town from gangs or kill a notorious bandit; instead, the three main characters simply want to get rich. Even Blondie is only The Good because he’s somewhat less horrible than the other two, and because he comforts a dying Confederate soldier towards the end; he’s first identified as The Good shortly after abandoning The Ugly in the desert to die. The performances from all three principals are outstanding, Lee Van Cleef ably demonstrating why he was cast as the villain in so many Westerns before this, Eli Wallach’s boisterous, larger than life Tuco providing most of the laughs, and Clint having perfected the steely coolness that would make his character, and himself, so legendary.

However, I shouldn’t overstate the grimness of the war or the moral ambiguity of the characters, since it’s important not to forget that The Good, The Bad and the Ugly is also terrific entertainment. With the increased emphasis on character, it’s the funniest of the Dollars Trilogy, and with twice the budget of For a Few Dollars More, it has all the spectacle and action you could hope for from an epic Western. The pacing problems that plagued its immediate predecessor are gone, and the film zips along at the same pace as A Fistful of Dollars: it may be twice as long, but it never feels like it. Add to this some of Ennio Morricone’s absolute best work, including a main theme every bit as iconic as James Bond’s, and an almost unbearably tense finale, and you have a Western that entertains every bit as much as it makes you think about the horrors of the Civil War.

The Good, The Bad and the Ugly is a film that no one should go without seeing. It confirmed both Clint Eastwood and Sergio Leone as major talents as actor and director, and is without doubt one of the greatest Westerns, and indeed one of the greatest films, ever made.

 

 

Emlyn Roberts-Harry

 

Related Reviews:

A Fistful of Dollars (1964)

For a Few Dollars More (1965)

 

« Previous
For a Few Dollars More (1965) review by That Film Dude
Next »
The Silence of the Lambs (1991) review by That Film Guy

About That Film Guy

A new group of film reviewers in the finest traditions of ThatFilmGuy.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sponsor Website

JEDINET LINK

TOP LIST

Top 30 Christmas Films

Top 30 Christmas Films

  Love Actually (2011) It's a Wonderful Life (1946) Elf (2003) A Christmas Story … Read More

Top 30 Horror Films

Top 30 Horror Films

Our list of the Top 30 Horror Movies of all Time. Do you Agree?.........Horror films are one of the … Read More

Top 30 Comedy Films

Top 30 Comedy Films

Our list of the Top 30 Comedy Movies of all Time. Do you Agree?.........One of the most popular and … Read More

Top 30 Animated Films

Top 30 Animated Films

Our list of the Top 30 Animated Movies of all Time. Do you Agree?.........The animated film genre … Read More

Top 30 Film Trilogies

Top 30 Film Trilogies

Our list of the Top 30 Movie Trilogies of all Time. Do you Agree?.........Before the 1970s a film … Read More

Top 30 Classic Action Films

Top 30 Classic Action Films

Our list of the Top 30 Classic Action Movies of all Time. Do you Agree?.........Catering for the … Read More

© 2022copyright Thatfilmguy.com and Trafford Innovations Limited