• Login
  • My Account
  • Logout
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy

THATFILMGUY

Film Previews, News, Reviews and Lists

  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Lists
  • Five Stars
  • News
You are here: Home / Film Reviews / Review: Kingdom of Heaven (2005)

Review: Kingdom of Heaven (2005)

July 7, 2011 by That Film Guy Leave a Comment

kingdom-of-heaven[pullquote cite=”” type=”left, right”][amazon text=Amazon&template=carousel&chan=That Film Guy&asin=B000K14LTA][/pullquote] When Kingdom of Heaven was released in 2005, it was met with a thoroughly mixed reception from critics and the box office alike. A vast majority of criticism was levelled at the lack of depth in the story and the performance of the main lead Orlando Bloom. In 2006, Ridley Scott was allowed to release his ˜Director’s Cut’ on DVD. Boasting an extra 45 minutes on the running time, it dramatically changes the film and gives it a sense of purpose that it lacked in the studio edit.

Set in the 12th Century, the film follows the life of Balian (Orlando Bloom) who is troubled by the suicide of his wife and his murder of half-brother (Michael Sheen) embarks with his father Godfrey (Liam Neeson) into a life of a crusader. Whilst in Jerusalem he becomes accustomed to the political climate and finds himself a pawn in the games of King Baldwin IV (Edward Norton).

Scott is known for his attention to detail, and Kingdom of Heaven never disappoints, with the feeling that every item of clothing and weaponry has been meticulously researched and hand-crafted. The camera shots are rich and engrossing and no expense has been spared in the search of perfection from a technical standpoint. Add to this the stellar supporting cast, including David Thewlis and Eva Green and it has all the hallmarks of a classic for the ages.

Unfortunately, Kingdom of Heaven falls short with the lead character. It’s not that Orlando Bloom is bad, in fact he’s better in the Director’s Cut than he is in almost any other film. He just spends so much of the film looking like someone who is standing in for the big star. You can’t help but think he would be more comfortable sipping a latte in his Hollywood mansion than fighting down and dirty in the sands of Jerusalem. It is such a shame too, because this version of the film is so close to being a stand-out epic that to fall short with one piece of casting seems harsh.

This is clearly Scott’s vision for the film, and it seems such a terrible waste to have released the far inferior version in cinemas. In the end however it is a hairs-breadth away from reaching the highest acclaim and must settle for simply being a great film with a sub-par lead.

Thomas Patrick 

« Previous
Review: Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004)
Next »
Review: Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl (2003)

About That Film Guy

A new group of film reviewers in the finest traditions of ThatFilmGuy.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sponsor Website

JEDINET LINK

TOP LIST

Top 30 Christmas Films

Top 30 Christmas Films

  Love Actually (2011) It's a Wonderful Life (1946) Elf (2003) A Christmas Story … Read More

Top 30 Horror Films

Top 30 Horror Films

Our list of the Top 30 Horror Movies of all Time. Do you Agree?.........Horror films are one of the … Read More

Top 30 Comedy Films

Top 30 Comedy Films

Our list of the Top 30 Comedy Movies of all Time. Do you Agree?.........One of the most popular and … Read More

Top 30 Animated Films

Top 30 Animated Films

Our list of the Top 30 Animated Movies of all Time. Do you Agree?.........The animated film genre … Read More

Top 30 Film Trilogies

Top 30 Film Trilogies

Our list of the Top 30 Movie Trilogies of all Time. Do you Agree?.........Before the 1970s a film … Read More

Top 30 Classic Action Films

Top 30 Classic Action Films

Our list of the Top 30 Classic Action Movies of all Time. Do you Agree?.........Catering for the … Read More

© 2022copyright Thatfilmguy.com and Trafford Innovations Limited