• Login
  • My Account
  • Logout
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy

THATFILMGUY

Film Previews, News, Reviews and Lists

  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Lists
  • Five Stars
  • News
You are here: Home / Film Reviews / Diamonds are Forever (1971) review by That Film Guy

Diamonds are Forever (1971) review by That Film Guy

October 10, 2012 by That Film Guy Leave a Comment

After the critical mauling that George Lazenby and the series had suffered after On Her Majesty’s Secret Service, the James Bond franchise looked back to the original Bond Sean Connery to bring a steady performance and right a potentially sinking ship. Diamonds are Forever took Bond back to the formula that had served it so well in the 1960s and gave the producers time to select a new Bond to properly take over from Connery.

MI6 operative James Bond (Connery) is sent to investigate a complex diamond smuggling plot that has links to SPECTRE and Bond’s long-time nemisis Ernst Stavro Blofeld (Charles Gray). Hunted by the sinister duo of Mr. Wint (Bruce Glover) and Mr Kidd (Putter Smith) bond must follow the trail to its source along with Plenty O’Toole (Lana Wood) to stop the diamonds from falling into the wrong hands.

Diamonds are Forever must have seemed like a good idea on paper. The returning Connery bring back credibility to the lead character sadly lost under the mishandling by predecessor Lazenby, while continuing to have Blofeld act as his enemy would link back to past glories. What was actually produced is one of the least effective, overly camp, non-sensical James Bond films of all time.

Suffering from a script as ridiculous as You Only Live Twice but without any of the fun, Diamonds are Forever is a joke of a spy film. The plot is silly, which is rarely a problem for the franchise, but in this case combining it with woeful villains Wint and Kidd, who wouldn’t be out of place in a pantomime and a Bond girl who is as feckless as any in the series and you’ve got a recipe for disaster. Connery is at least solid, and by this period in his career knew the character inside and out. The action scenes are also fairly impressive, including the memorable moon buggy chase, but outside of these there is little to recommend the film.

Not the worst film in the series, but close, Diamonds are Forever firmly placed the slick, stylish 1960s behind it and set the scene for the oncoming camp-fuelled storm that would be the Roger Moore era.

 

 

Thomas Patrick

 

« Previous
On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (1969) review by That Film Guy
Next »
Ruby Sparks (2012) review by That Film Brat

About That Film Guy

A new group of film reviewers in the finest traditions of ThatFilmGuy.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sponsor Website

JEDINET LINK

TOP LIST

Top 30 Christmas Films

Top 30 Christmas Films

  Love Actually (2011) It's a Wonderful Life (1946) Elf (2003) A Christmas Story … Read More

Top 30 Horror Films

Top 30 Horror Films

Our list of the Top 30 Horror Movies of all Time. Do you Agree?.........Horror films are one of the … Read More

Top 30 Comedy Films

Top 30 Comedy Films

Our list of the Top 30 Comedy Movies of all Time. Do you Agree?.........One of the most popular and … Read More

Top 30 Animated Films

Top 30 Animated Films

Our list of the Top 30 Animated Movies of all Time. Do you Agree?.........The animatedĀ film genre … Read More

Top 30 Film Trilogies

Top 30 Film Trilogies

Our list of the Top 30 Movie Trilogies of all Time. Do you Agree?.........Before the 1970s a film … Read More

Top 30 Classic Action Films

Top 30 Classic Action Films

Our list of the Top 30 Classic Action Movies of all Time. Do you Agree?.........Catering for the … Read More

© 2025copyright Thatfilmguy.com and Trafford Innovations Limited